Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Heartlander
What is ‘your’ problem? Or problem with the article?

There is no "there" there. It's a big "So what?" It is not "Evidence Disproving Evolution," never mind it being cited as such.

I am not trying to prove creationism.

It's a creationist paper, originally published in a creationist publication. It's all head-fake, a lot of squirmy detail designed to gull those who can't read and understand into thinking that somehow what mainstream science says about vitamin C and mutations and evolution is wrong. It might work on people who already don't ask inconvenient questions, even to themselves.

What are you trying to prove?

I didn't post it here. I merely point out its factual content has no implications for the discussion. Perhaps you needed it explained to you. If so, I did the honors.

Vade, by saying you are the source of knowledge and judgment, am I implying that you are; a pixie, fairy, or an imaginary being?

The dance of what you are not saying is an old game. Why don't you think a bit about what you are saying and then try to say it?

44 posted on 11/03/2003 6:37:16 PM PST by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: VadeRetro
You explained nothing yet implied everything.

Why don't you think a bit about what you are saying and then try to say it?

Fine:

You're not very accurate, and your inaccuracy seems very self-serving.

Ironically, it appears that you are posting on a Creationist site and following a Creationist leader. (by your own standards)

"On the issue of evolution, the verdict is still out on how God created the Earth."
-President George W Bush

What is ‘he’ saying?
Actually, why don't you think a bit about what you are saying and then try to say it.

I am not a Creationist but I don’t know if our President is… He is a Christian like myself though…
Is everyone who questions evolution a Creationist? Well, I think we both know that those who question neo-darwinism are not necessarily a Creationist.

No Child Left Behind Law
Signed by George W. Bush on January 8, 2002

Creationism, it’s a PC label applied by whom? You can straddle the fence with your agnostic label but why say that Christians are Creationists and all religions should be ignored based on ‘your’ scientific data?

Please explain how intelligence came from mindlessness. If you believe this than you are part of a religion.

47 posted on 11/03/2003 8:06:56 PM PST by Heartlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson