[donh]

No, you said, in response to the question "So in your opinion who is to blame for killing Jesus Christ?": "Romans, of course--contrary to anything Matthew or John might have said."

This does not constitute advice not to read what Matthew says. It is, in fact, my point, which you are having a hard time getting to, that you should read Matthew and see what it says, and recognize that it is a purposefully false account intended to blame jews for something romans did.

[Bohemund]

This does not constitute advice not to read what Matthew says. It is, in fact, my point, which you are having a hard time getting to, that you should read Matthew and see what it says, and recognize that it is a purposefully false account intended to blame jews for something romans did.

So like I said, you think we should ignore Matthew's account--because it's "false."

You are, of course, entitled to your unsubstantiated opinion that Matthew's account is "purposefully false" and intended to blame Jews for something Romans did. And I am entitled to my opinion that you are divorced from reality.