The New York Times editorial
12/25/41 (Late Day edition, p. 24)
A summary, with extensive cites, from the Jewish Virtual library of the concern, which remains largely unaddressed by these glowing quotes and testimonials:
http://www.us-israel.org/jsource/anti-semitism/pius.html
The glaring fact is, Pacelli worked hard for accords to shut up about the jews, and kept his part of the bargain, holding back the official Voice of Jesus on the subject, even after his ascention, upon hearing about Kristalnacht, allowing his priests to administer to the German army, allowing his churches to continue to provide the SS with marriage and birth documents, as per agreement, until the xmas address of 42 while 6 million jews were starved enslaved, humiliated, tortured, in a manner undreamt of by Torquimada, and then killed as cheaply and inhumanely as possible. How many of the polish victims of Hitler were vivisected, urinated on in cattle cars, skinned, forced to eat faeces, leg-tied while giving birth, sent naked into "showers" to watch their children and parents choke to death in front of them?
The pope saved a comparative handful of the jews that were condemned by Hitler--but that is not a defense against the sobriquet of Pius the Silent, which he properly earned, no matter how loudly, frequently and self-righteously you repeat it.
Nah, your arguments have already been thumped, no matter how loudly, frequently and self-righteously you repeat it.