[CobaltBlue]

If you look closely at the restored photo, the woman actually has breasts.

As for the disembodied hand, do a google search. All the art historians mention it.

If you have a print of the second version, or if you have a print of the original version prior to restoration, it's different.

[Bohemund]

If you look closely at the restored photo, the woman actually has breasts.

As for the disembodied hand, do a google search. All the art historians mention it.

Well, I didn't see any breasts or a knife: See for yourself.