To: blam
Clovis-First proponents have contested the radiocarbon dates for nearly three decades now, asserting that radiocarbon dating samples may have been contaminated with coal particles or other carboniferous material carried by groundwater.They are getting ridiculous. The "Clovis-firsts" have their minds set in stone, no pun intended.
7 posted on
11/02/2003 4:46:09 PM PST by
stands2reason
(REWARD! Tagline missing since 10/21. Pithy, clever. Last seen in Chat. Sentimental value.)
To: stands2reason
Yup. I wonder if they apply the same radiocarbon error possibilities to their own sites?
9 posted on
11/02/2003 5:47:36 PM PST by
gcruse
(http://gcruse.typepad.com/)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson