Not disputing your personal experience, but I think the back and forth on this thread is ignoring a more important point than whether Oswald was the lone SHOOTER. What I'm more interested in knowing is whether he was part of a larger conspiracy, possibly by the mafia? to kill Kennedy.
I mean, Jack Ruby shooting him is what clinches it in my mind.
Would it not be more interesting, to consider why the government has gone to great lengths to insure that most people think it was a conspiracy, by both presenting a scenario that is easily disproved, while also providing evidence of a conspiracy that cannot be proven?
Dont both scenarios presented only lead you away from what might be something other than the two popular conclusions? Didnt the government give each of us an "either-or" decision, leading us away from asking other questions, outside of the 'presented' evidence; insuring that this issue is NEVER solved?