Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: scripter
This absolutely HAS to be unconstitutional.
3 posted on 10/30/2003 10:38:36 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Howlin
This absolutely HAS to be unconstitutional.

I would really like to hear what Jay Seculow of the ACLJ has to say about it.

4 posted on 10/30/2003 10:43:06 PM PST by scripter (Thousands have left the homosexual lifestyle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Howlin
Wasn't a Christian man turned down by big brothers - sisters for character - moral defects !
5 posted on 10/30/2003 10:43:27 PM PST by f.Christian (evolution vs intelligent design ... science3000 ... designeduniverse.com --- * architecture * !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Howlin
Free speech, free exercise of religion....and they gave her homosexual ex-lover joint custody for no reason! And now the reformed homosexual can't get her daughter away from that life, and now must withhold her own beliefs from her? This is such unmitigated bullskite. I'm sickened.
6 posted on 10/30/2003 10:48:09 PM PST by stands2reason (REWARD! Tagline missing since 10/21. Last seen in Chat. Pithy, clever. Sentimental value.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Howlin
It is, no doubt, but will that deter the Olympians of the bench, who left the Constitution behind a while back?
31 posted on 10/30/2003 11:47:47 PM PST by AmericanVictory (Should we be more like them, or they like us?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Howlin
On appeal, there is NO WAY this stands up.

Joint custody w/ a non-involved person, 1st amendment issues; an obviously pro-homosexual activist decision.

This will get tossed out.
32 posted on 10/30/2003 11:48:15 PM PST by clee1 (Where's the beef???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Howlin
This absolutely HAS to be unconstitutional.

LOL< this goes beyond unconstitutional and enters the realm of anti-constitutional.

But if Sandra Day O'Connor, Justice Kennedy and their fellow travelers on the left side oof the SCOTUS get their way, the US Constitution will simply be a guideline for the oligarchies, not the law.

Their expressed preference for incorporating the laws and mores of Europastad in America rather than be guided by the US Constitution is not just hyperbole from right wing nuts like myself, it's the truth.

74 posted on 10/31/2003 6:02:12 AM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Howlin
If this isn't nipped in the bud there will be another civil war soon...christians against the secularists.

The line is being drawn in the sand.
98 posted on 10/31/2003 7:32:45 AM PST by Domestic Church (AMDG...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Howlin
This absolutely HAS to be unconstitutional.

If it is not we can kiss our freedom of speech and religion good bye

115 posted on 10/31/2003 3:15:08 PM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Howlin
This absolutely HAS to be unconstitutional.

It certainly will be if Sandra Day O'Connor has anything to say about it.

When someone appointed by Reagan (IIRC) starts thinking that perversely...
our "cold" culture war is about to go "hot".
121 posted on 10/31/2003 4:36:04 PM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson