Judge to Christian mom: No 'homophobic' teaching

Worldnetdaily ^ | October 31, 2003

[wolficatZ]

"What is it, agrophobia? An unatural fear of heights"

Ummm....

[Protagoras]

Yours was based on your interpretation of some decision, just your opinion. It isn't the first one you had that we disagreed on.

[jwalsh07]

I hadn't noticed.

[Protagoras]

Add that to the list.

[Hat-Trick]

You're free to agree with them. Otherwise, sit down, and if you don't shut-up, hire a lawyer and prepare to be sued.

Hat-Trick

[jwalsh07]

I don't keep lists but, rest assured, if I did I would add whatever it is you're talking about to the "list".

[Protagoras]

Things you hadn't noticed. It's a long list I'm sure.

[RobbyS]

Send this to Justice Kennedy. Obviously this judge has read his over-the-top opinion in Lawrence. Not that Kennedy gives a damn so long as his belt-way friends approve of what he days.

[jwalsh07]

You sound a tad bitter.

Do I whip you often in debate? :-}

[Hat-Trick]

Which is why the side that will lose is trying so hard to take away our guns.

Wanna scare the crap out of a liberal? Show them this picture:

Hat-Trick

[Protagoras]

I've never seen you whip anyone,,but hey, there's always a 1st time! And I'm not in the least bit bitter, the world is full of guys like you. :^}

[jwalsh07]

LOL. One of us has a bit of a problem, that's for sure, it's either my memory or your ego.

But I'll remember you now, you've etched yourself in my aging mind.

[Protagoras]

I don't think either one of us has any big problems. We just disagree on basic rights issues. If memory serves me well on my aging mind, you are a big supporter of government power as a solution to societal problems. If I'm wrong about that, I apologise. I could have you mixed up with someone else.

I believe in individual liberty and rights and personal responsibility. If you do too, I must have you mixed up with drug warriors and other such folks.

[PeyersPatches]

Amen!!!

[jwalsh07]

Well, we can establish where we stand right here and now prota.

It is my belief that Lawrence V Texas was incorrectly decided by the SCOTUS and their opinion is not constitutionally grounded. Sodomy laws fall under the tenth amendment.

Supporters of an overly strong central government take the view that these things are the province of a central court in DC.

Which side do you stand on?

[BibChr]

UN
BE
LIEVABLE

[Domestic Church]

If this isn't nipped in the bud there will be another civil war soon...christians against the secularists.

The line is being drawn in the sand.

[BSunday]

has been ordered by Denver County Circuit Judge John W. Coughlin to "make sure that there is nothing in the religious upbringing or teaching that the minor child is exposed to that can be considered homophobic."

Somebody needs a freepin, or at least an @s$ kickin

JUDICIAL OUTRAGE PING. If you want on or off this list let me know.

[Protagoras]

I have to go now, but the ninth amendment is the operative one in this case.,,To be continued....