Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SamAdams76
Personally I suspect that an accelerated plan to take down ALL government supporters of terrorism, starting with Iran, would be put into action immediately. If nukes, dirty bombs, or chemical weapons start flying in US cities then there isn't much to loose by shutting down the Saudi's and Syrians much less the Hizb'Allah whacko's in the territories and Lebanon. Would we use nukes - I suspect only if the top military commanders conclude that they are the only way to achieve the mission.

The one mission I see as possibly requiring nukes would be to get the Muslim governments and thier populations to immediately halt all funding for terrorist groups. If the terrorists get strong enough it may come down to us or them and if thats the case then we don't have time for social change to convince the non-violent Muslims to change sides. So I suppose it could come down to GWB re-issuing his 'you're with us or against' us speach with the additional caveat that 'if you're not with us by noon tomorrow you will be with Allah.
308 posted on 10/30/2003 7:03:17 PM PST by cdrw (Freedom and responsibility are inseparable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies ]


To: cdrw
much to lose (not loose) that is - oops
309 posted on 10/30/2003 7:38:18 PM PST by cdrw (Freedom and responsibility are inseparable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 308 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson