Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sweetliberty
Apparently it's that "keeping only unto her" part that he has some trouble with.

Well, we wouldn't want him to "suffer" by going without sex, now would we? I mean, who could blame the poor guy. < /sarcasm >

And no, of course I don't mind your editing. I was kind of worried about the space all those threads were going to take up. You did a great job putting this thread together, especially since you were so rushed. :-)
284 posted on 10/29/2003 7:07:05 PM PST by iowamomforfreedom (Why is it illegal to starve an animal but not a human being?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies ]


To: iowamomforfreedom
Well, we wouldn't want him to "suffer" by going without sex, now would we?

Why not, he was paid $300,000 for loss of consortium. He was paid for having to go without!!

366 posted on 10/29/2003 9:36:32 PM PST by trussell (PRAYER WORKS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson