To: Howlin
Whatever are you shrieking about now? Of course I don't have a name. That's precisely my point. There are no conservatives, or even candidates vaguely committed to preserving the nation, running yet for President.
On a scale of 1 to 10, with the Dem candidates all getting between 0 and 2. Bush gets about a 3.
264 posted on
10/28/2003 5:58:26 PM PST by
dagnabbit
(Covering for Guilty Saudis = Accessory After the Fact.)
To: dagnabbit
Let me guess. If he commits arson against schools, that'll raise his estimation level to a 5, eh?
To: dagnabbit
On a scale of 1 to 10, with the Dem candidates all getting between 0 and 2. Bush gets about a 3 And who rates an 8 or 9 according to your scale?
Still waiting for a name or do you just like to rant in the warm bosom of malcontent anonymity?
267 posted on
10/28/2003 6:02:26 PM PST by
Dane
To: dagnabbit
Of course I don't have a name. That's precisely my point. There are no conservatives, or even candidates vaguely committed to preserving the nation, running yet for President. Well, why not? I thought you guys had ALL the answers and could do it so much better than anybody else.
Why can't you field a viable candidate?
302 posted on
10/28/2003 6:32:39 PM PST by
Howlin
(A Democratic president is MUCH better than being a RINO!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson