[witnesstothefall]

I'm bloviating now. Is it funny? I'm aware of the distinctions you draw; I've heard them drawn by knuckle-draggers before.

Don't let me distract you from constructing more violence-on-women fantasies.

If it's so important for you, then yes, extreme situations do occur when the physical submission of a female by a male is called for, even to the extent you fantasize about - 2 in the chest and 1 in the head. What wonderful imagery your fantasy provides.

You know what they call folks who like to deal in extremes? Extremists.

[dirtboy]

Don't let me distract you from constructing more violence-on-women fantasies.

So a woman can threaten lethal harm to a man, in the form of a knifepoint robbery, but men cannot respond with lethal force? Funny, I've read the self-defense statutes from several states, and I've never seen a gender differentiation in those statutes.

[ArrogantBustard]

Bwahahahaha!!!!!! Are you trying to flame me, sonny-boy? You'll have to do better than that.

You posted an idiotic statement; I called you on it. It's no big deal. Or it shouldn't be. A gentleman would graciously admit it, and go on with life.

But nooooooo, that's not good enough! Instead, you have to regurgitate a steaming heap of hardcore feminist drivel. I almost feel sorry for you. Did you marry Katherine MacKinnon?

OBTW, Bustards don't have knuckles.