Skip to comments.
Episcopal Priest Resigns Amid Gay Debate - Donors Threaten Money Withdrawal (Rome, Georgia)
MyWay News ^
Posted on 10/27/2003 2:20:21 AM PST by Happy2BMe
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-28 last
To: Marauder
Another point in all this is Robinson knew this would tear the church apart. How "godly" can a man be who puts his ambition and desires above the church and above God's law? I think Robinson is selfish as well as gay, neither trait would I like to have in my parish priest.
To: samanella
You're absolutely right -- it's all about him. Just like Clinton.
To: Happy2BMe
What part of "NO" don't gay sympathisers understand?
So now it isn't only the gays we are supposed to condemn,
but those who don't condemn them. McCarthy was a piker
compared to the religiously convinced.
23
posted on
10/27/2003 10:32:15 AM PST
by
gcruse
(http://gcruse.typepad.com/)
To: Happy2BMe
I saw a guy walking out of an Epioscopal church carrying a Queen James bible. Hadn't seen one before. Rainbow on the cover too.
To: gcruse
So now it isn't only the gays we are supposed to condemn, but those who don't condemn them.Do you really understand the issue?
25
posted on
10/27/2003 5:54:12 PM PST
by
Marauder
(If God lived on earth, liberals would sue Him.)
To: Marauder
Do you really understand the issue?
An Episcopal priest who wrote an article sympathetic
to the church's confirmation of an openly gay priest as a bishop resigned
John Merchant was condemned for his failure to condemn
the gay priest. Actually, he was condemned for writing his
opinion. Apparently this was a big mistake. But this just
reiterates what I originally said, doesn't it?
Let's run the WayBack machine.
In response to :
What part of "NO" don't gay sympathisers understand?
I said
So now it isn't only the gays we are supposed
to condemn, but those who don't condemn them.
In other words, 'gay sympathisers', ie those who
fail to condemn gays, will be condemned for failing
to say NO. What part do you feel I misunderstand?
26
posted on
10/27/2003 6:08:17 PM PST
by
gcruse
(http://gcruse.typepad.com/)
To: gcruse
He didn't "fail to condemn." He wrote an article clearly in support of the apostatic ordination of Robinson as bishop.
I can't speak for others; however, I bear no animosity toward Robinson because of his sexual orientation. My problem is that his becoming a bishop is contrary to Biblical law. Thus I also have a big problem with the Bishop of the ECUSA, without whose support - for Robinson as bishop of New Hampshire - this situation would not have developed.
27
posted on
10/27/2003 6:38:13 PM PST
by
Marauder
(If God lived on earth, liberals would sue Him.)
To: Marauder
He didn't "fail to condemn." He wrote an article clearly in support of the apostatic ordination of Robinson as bishop.
Sounds like failure to condemn to me.
28
posted on
10/27/2003 6:48:21 PM PST
by
gcruse
(http://gcruse.typepad.com/)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-28 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson