I HAD DINNER WITH ANN COULTER

SELF | 10/26/2003 | Moneyrunner

[Mr. Mojo]

Diet Coke

Diet? I wonder if Ann thinks she's fat? It certainly wouldn't be the first time a tall, sub-100 lb woman held that delusion.

[moneyrunner]

Sorry, I actually have a few digital pictures of Ann, Hannity, Limbaugh and - of course - me. BUT I don't know how to post them. Can anyone help?

[Larry Lucido]

Good portrait. All things considered, I'd rather have dinner with Ann Coulter than Ayn Rand, though.

[Khurkris]

" don’t want to brag

Then why did you.

I don't want to brag either, but I stayed at a Holiday Inn last night!!!

me either...but...I saved a lot of money on my car insurance.

[tioga]

Go to search and look for HTML Sandbox, all you need to know is there.

[Tijeras_Slim]

He may still be mad at FR, but I'd bet he lurks.

How else is he gonna get scoops? :)

[RWR8189]

Yeah, well I lowered my cholesterol

[ex-Texan]

But she really is, really she truly is. Went to the University of Michigan. Most Freepers would not like her politics but she is quite intelligent. Her intelligence explains her fantastic success in the entertainment Biz because she is a trained dancer and not a singer. Also, she is headstrong, independent, does not give a rip for convention. She is passionate about what she believes in and does not mince words. She also paid for the drinks (we drank quite a bit after dinner) which is a sure sign of a truly liberated woman. 'Nuff said.

[mlmr]

She has hairy breasts????

[Pharmboy]

Character counts. Plenty of awful people are smart...as a Freeper you certainly know their names as well as I do!

[Mr. Mojo]

Madonna, not Ann.

[SchuylerTheViking]

As an individual I may agree with you. But as a Supreme Court Justice I SHOULD NOT have the right to go beyond the powers the Constitution provides to impose my ideas of right and wrong on the country.

Do you think the Founding Fathers would have thought it permissible to require the surpassing of an intelligence threshhold on the right to bear children? I agree with you that the issue is not necessarily specifically addressed in the Constitution, but what about this excerpt from Section 1 of Amendment 14:

"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

Wouldn't bearing children be considered a "privilege" of citizens of the United States? It's arguable isn't it?

[RedsHunter]

Well, apparently a few years ago some people here got very abusive with Drudge, so he cut the link. And he’s still mad.

Strange, I don't remember it being that way at all. My memory is that some unkind types posted some "nazi" related things here and Drudge took offense at them (the was before "Admin Moderator" days) and so removed the FR link on his page, giving no real explanation as to why he did it at the time. The "nazi" rationale only seemed to come out a few months later, as I recall.

[GladesGuru]

No!, No!, NO!!!

In FloriDUH, they starve/dehydrate the brain injured. Idiots are placed on the bench of the state supreme court.

[Fractal Trader]

Well, apparently a few years ago some people here got very abusive with Drudge

My understanding is that there was a thread on him and Lucianne talking about Drudge as a homoerotic icon, or something to that effect.

Of course this was back in the days when FR used to post conspiratorial scat such as Michael Rivera on the same plane as the news of the day.

[Normal4me]

"In FloriDUH..."

Head north if ya don't like it here pal.

[RedBloodedAmerican]

Boy you guys are doing whatever you can do draw TLB out of the woodwork, aren't you?

[lawdude]

"Based on the debate topic the answer we should have given is: Yes. We agree with the decision."

I believe I would have added, "Well Alan, you are not a father are you?"

[Ditter]

I saw her once in DC. When I tell you... the girl is skinny.... LOL I wished she had sneezed on me or something so I could catch it. I need a little bit of skinny. Beautiful woman & very smart, glad she is on our side.

[PeoplesRepublicOfWashington]

As an individual I may agree with you. But as a Supreme Court Justice I SHOULD NOT have the right to go beyond the powers the Constitution provides to impose my ideas of right and wrong on the country.

That is why we are a free people. That is why we have legislators. That is what the democratic process is all about.

This country must not be ruled by benevolent philosopher kings. They have a habit of liquidating those who stand in the way of their view of the perfect society.

Then we should redefine all judicial systems in this country to be courts of law only and dispense with the concept of equity. By defining our courts to be in law and in equity, we subscribe to the concept that judges are somehow god-like. We also need to dispense with judicial immunity. We can never be truly free until judges are held to the same standards that they impose upon the rest of us.