I HAD DINNER WITH ANN COULTER

SELF | 10/26/2003 | Moneyrunner

[theFIRMbss]

[moneyrunner]

[Political Junkie Too]

Well, apparently a few years ago some people here got very abusive with Drudge, so he cut the link. And he’s still mad.

The specific reason was this: Drudge got Drudged by FR and he was very upset about it.

The story was the Jesse Jackson Love Child. Drudge had the page coded on his site but hadn't linked it to his main page yet, and was teasing it all week. Some Freeper figured out Drudge's naming convention and was looking for a file like jj.html on his site, found the story, and linked it on Free Republic before Drudge had a chance to reveal his scoop.

That was the day that Drudge removed Free Republic from his site.

-PJ

[Political Junkie Too]

See my post #83.

[Delphinium]

I wondered about that? Why did he take the Newsmax link off?

[Delphinium]

I agree that Drudge has done alot of good things,

We can learn to live with our own frailties, and with those of others.

Amen

Sometimes the hardest part is living down what are own frailties have caused.

[GladesGuru]

I do hope such rudeness isn't "Normal4U" if I may be allowed a pun. Please note that I am a native, and have no intention of allowing a flock of socialism impaired Liberals, socialists, ad nauseam, to either drive me from my lands, or further degrade this state of the habitats.

Try refuting what I say instead of resorting to argumentum ad hominim.

Please note that from my description of Florida courts to my comments on the abysmal level of FloriDUH education - all are hard data based. Try such an approach instead of mindless attack in your future posts. You will educate yourself in the process, and might even raise the level on conversation on FR.

[GirlyGirl2003]

Madonna is a lewd crude aging has-been. She can stuff her leftist politics.

[Normal4me]

"In FloriDUH, they starve/dehydrate the brain injured. Idiots are placed on the bench of the state supreme court."

Unfortunately, this was a very bad decision. If they wanted to execute her, they should have given her a lethal injection. Idiots are on the bench because the state is comprised mostly of snowbird/carpetbagging democrats. I happen to like my state and get offended when people disrespect it because Democrats could'nt figure out how to punch a hole in a piece of paper.

Don't disrepect our state because we are the minority, go out and help us get it back!

[GladesGuru]

The Republicans are now the majority. But the damage from decades of gorging on the poison fruit of the Tree of Liberalism lingers on.

As to the infamous Palm Beach voters, and the "chad" problem, as I see it, that was one more self inflicted wound. Voting with punch ballots is a very reliable method and leaves a verifiable paper trail Errors were minimal and we FReepers did have an influence in the media.

Be of good cheer - the day of socialism is just about over.

[stands2reason]

I like Dick Cheney---He reminds me of my Dad, who recently passed away. I'd also definitely buy dinner for Mark Steyn. I'd like to have dinner with Dennis Miller as well, but it'd be dutch.

MY M-I-L is on a first name basis with W. (She was TX President of the Ladies' Auxiliary of the VFW.) He used to live on the same street as my jr. college boyfriend wayyyy back in the 80's. (I'd always wave at his house driving by on my scooter and say, "Hey, Bushie!" even though I was a liberal back then. LOL!)

[Sloth]

sing this section of the constitution the courts have re-arranged American society. Using this section, they have superimposed their sovereign will over us. Remember, the original intent was to have the legislatures of the nation and the various states make the laws. The judges were then to look at the constitution – a very short document – and see if there was an explicit prohibition against that law. If not, it stood.

OK, so you don't like the 14th Amendment. But do you really think the gov't ought to be in the business of deciding who is an 'imbecile'?

What about the 4th Amendment... "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

What's the probable cause for seizing a person of low intelligence, if they have committed no crime?

[Poohbah]

Did she mention TLBSHOW ?

BWAHAHAHAHA!

[Chancellor Palpatine]

She probably asked where the courthouse was so she could file for a restraining order....

[Cultural Jihad]

[Bob J]

Click Here for the RadioFR website!

Live NOW on RadioFreeRepublic!
ON FIRE! With Tom Adkins!
If you’ve never listened to Tom, tune in and find out why he’s called a cross between Rush Limbaugh and Michael Savage!

7pm Pacific/10pm Eastern!

Click HERE to listen LIVE NOW while you FReep!

Would you like to receive a note when RadioFR is on the air? Send an email to radiofreerepublic-subscribe@radioactive.kicks-ass.net!

Click HERE to chat in the RadioFR chat room!

[moneyrunner]

”OK, so you don't like the 14th Amendment. But do you really think the gov't ought to be in the business of deciding who is an 'imbecile'?

Well, since you asked, the government has a positive duty to decide who is and who is not capable of exercising normal, responsible and mature judgment. For example, if you are a minor, you cannot enter into an enforceable contract. A guardian must be appointed to act on your behalf. Minors can argue that this is blatant age discrimination and – under your interpretation of the 14th amendment – should be unconstitutional. So far, no court has found it so, but I’m sure that interpretation will be argued to exist somewhere in the emanations and penumbras of the constitution. That same discrimination is exercised in the case of the mentally incompetent, the comatose and the dead. I know- I know it’s discriminatory, but that’s the way our society oppresses the insane, the unconscious and the expired.

”What about the 4th Amendment... "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

What's the probable cause for seizing a person of low intelligence, if they have committed no crime?

Well, here again you have some people who will take words that the government can’t bust into your house without a warrant and say that means that we they can’t stop two imbeciles from producing more imbeciles. I’m not sure that I see the connection, but I’m sure that you do.

Your concern for the insane is widely shared, however, by the more enlightened among us who decided a few decades ago that we were depriving these poor creatures of their constitutional rights by warehousing them in (what an older generation called) insane asylums.

So we closed the asylums. You will now find the freed former inhabitants exercising their constitutional rights as they roam the our cities with their belongings piled into shopping carts and sleeping under bridges, using the public bathrooms to procreate and the public streets to defecate.

But getting back to the issue of judges and the courts, the point I have been trying to make is that these are rightfully public policy decisions to be decided by legislatures and city councils, not judges who wish to exercise some Olympian power over the rest of us. Even the wackiest city councils eventually get it. Los Angeles just passed a law making it illegal to empty your bladder or your bowels on the public street. Civil libertarians are up in arms over this denial of their constitutional rights.

[theFIRMbss]

[theFIRMbss]

The "Ann" images
gathered together reveal
it's a power name --