Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Teen pulling prank killed by neighbor
The Palm Beach Post ^ | Sunday, October 26 | Sarah Eisenhauer and Cynthia Kopkowski

Posted on 10/26/2003 4:41:29 AM PST by lifacs

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460461-480481-500501-520 next last
To: JZoback
"Shooting someone in the back while fleeing is illegal."

Not if they're taking a hostage or a victim with them.
461 posted on 10/27/2003 5:56:08 AM PST by ought-six
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
"'What is so important that you are defending that you need a gun?' said Quiroga, the mother of two teenage boys, before breaking into tears."

This woman either doesn't think before she speaks or has resigned herself to being a perpetual victim. I'd tell her: MY LIFE AND THE LIVES OF MY LOVED ONES ARE WORTH DEFENDING, AND A GUN IS AN EFFECTIVE TOOL FOR THAT!
462 posted on 10/27/2003 6:01:37 AM PST by ought-six
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: lifacs
I often amswer the door with a loaded gun in my hand, but unless the visitor tries to push their way in they will never see it or even know it.
If I lived in a rural area and someone was prowling in my yard, that's a different story. They better have a very good explaination.
463 posted on 10/27/2003 6:02:27 AM PST by Manic_Episode
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: durham62
"Its people who overreact who the most fun to play with..."

So they had haraassed the man before to know that he would overreact--

They were harassing him because they knew he would over react--

Looks kike you let the cat out of the bag.

464 posted on 10/27/2003 8:09:28 AM PST by gatex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 437 | View Replies]

To: carl in alaska
We dont even know where the kid was shot? All we know is that he collapsed on a neighbors lawn. Perhaps he was in the foyer?
465 posted on 10/27/2003 8:20:36 AM PST by alisasny (No one is listening until you make a mistake.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 448 | View Replies]

To: alisasny
The 16 year old should not have been out wandering the streets at 1230 am.

It is well known that curfew violations carry the death penalty.

466 posted on 10/27/2003 8:23:25 AM PST by Protagoras (Hating Democrats doesn't make you a conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: durham62
"Its people who overreact who the most fun to play with"

You just don't get it do you. Sounds like there was malicious intent involved. People who over-react are probably terrified, and maybe with good reason. My mother lived in terror the last weeks of her life because a drunk would knock on her door late at night and demand money. I'm sorry, sixteen year olds should have more sense. No, your friend did not deserve to die but unfortunately many so called "innocent" pranks end in tragedy. But you own words give away the fact that this prank was not so innocent.
467 posted on 10/27/2003 8:24:30 AM PST by k omalley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 437 | View Replies]

To: k omalley
When I said:
"Its people who overreact who the most fun to play with"
I was referring to gatex who is completely lacking in knowledge of what happened, but abundant is assumptions that make him look like a "wise scholar".
468 posted on 10/27/2003 1:13:52 PM PST by durham62
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 467 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
I was replying to post #40, which was a comment on this:

"What is so important that you are defending that you need a gun?" said Quiroga, the mother of two teenage boys, before breaking into tears.

469 posted on 10/27/2003 6:46:22 PM PST by Djarum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 348 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
I'm not saying that there are not circumstances which could lead to a witness only hearing the shot, and then as a 'pop' instead of a bang, or being oblivious to any commotion outside. Apparently one door which was not knocked on or doorbell rung belonged to the witness.

At the same time, I have trouble envisioning not looking out a window, checking the door before getting ready for bed, etc. All opportunities to become aware that something is going on on the witness' street.

But then, I live in a 90 year old house, and used to tend bar in a biker bar where the clientelle was pretty laid back until some wannabe came in and started something, so I have an eye/ear for trouble brewing. Anything out of the ordinary becomes the object of investigation.

470 posted on 10/28/2003 8:12:37 AM PST by Smokin' Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
The rest of them are clearly dangerous people. They leave the front appearance of their properties open and inviting just as if there were normal folks inside. We can imagine them cowaring behind their front doors, loaded firearm at the ready, just waiting to shoot the first person foolish enough to ever ring their doorbell.

First off, who is to say having a firearm in the home renders someone other than "normal people"? In my State, not having a firearm in your home is abnormal, if you consider the majority "normal". Here, building walls around your property is only an accumulator for snow drifts in the winter and a grand way to cut off any summer breezes. Better to be able to see what is going on and act appropriately than cower behind a wall and be surprised. Note also, we have some of the lowest rates of violent and property crime in the nation..

That said, If the homeowner stepped outside and shot the fleeing kid in the back, it is murder. There is no justification for shooting someone who has committed no violent act and is retreating.

Alternately, other factors (death threats from another source, for instance) nay have prompted the homeowner to respond inappropriately to a mere prank. If this can be shown in court, the homeowner may have a defense.

The most dangerous people in the world are simply scared. To try and point the finger one way or the other in the absence of the full picture is being a bit premature.

I regularly have teens show up on my doorstep, but then, I have a teenage granddaughter. Some of these guys (and girls) look pretty freaky by our generation's standards, but their eyes are clear, and under the trappings of a youthful search for identity are some bright, decent adults-to-be.

I don't come to the door with gun in hand (I have other items in reach which will give me time to upgrade if necessary). But if someone tries to break that door down, the picture changes significantly.

Mistakes were made on both sides here. The kid should not have been ringing this guy's doorbell, for one.. The guy should not have shot the kid, for another... The courts will have to sort it out from there. Damned shame for all involved.

471 posted on 10/28/2003 8:52:37 AM PST by Smokin' Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe
Having a gun in the home is certainly normal. In fact, not having a gun in the home and living in any number of "bad neighborhoods" would be abnormal.

What I suggested was that certain "abnormal" people might well lie in wait for the unwary innocent person to foolishly ring the doorbell.

472 posted on 10/28/2003 8:58:24 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 471 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
Not just property value, but location, business, etc. Everything needed by any hate campaign to force the guy out of business (phone denial-of service attack), or just show up and trample the grounds.

While this is a tragic situation, and the guy may be guilty as a Clinton, I really hate 'Trial by Press'.

473 posted on 10/28/2003 9:01:20 AM PST by Smokin' Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies]

To: Osage Orange
In some places in the world, curfew violators are shot on sight. The curfews are commonly far earlier than 12:30, local time.
474 posted on 10/28/2003 9:07:06 AM PST by Smokin' Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 275 | View Replies]

To: elfman2
We abdicate the responsibility of retaliatory use of force to police, and I think that it’s in all our best interest that we expect the person who goes beyond that, to end a life in order to protect his interests, to have to spend a precious second our two to “think up a reasonable reason not to shoot” before pulling the trigger

tick bang bang tick. Time's up! You can shoot now.

Such situations commonly do not give a second or two.

Criminal perpetrators will not stop a couple of seconds, their minds are allready made up, there is no decision to be made. You can call it off right up until the hammer falls, but if you have reason to suspect a threat to your life, you'd better be ready.

A license to carry concealed, or even the possession of a firearm is not a 'license to kill', as many in the press would put it, but rather the enormous responsibility of protecting yourself and others without causing harm to the undeserving. Nothing will give as close a perspective on the responsibility police officers face daily as carrying a weapon in public as a civillian, where inappropriately producing the weapon can be considered assault with a deadly weapon.

With that in mind, most concealed weapons permit holders will be sure they have a situation in which deadly force is appropriate before the weapon is produced. You have to be aware of your surroundings to not be surprised.

IMHO, this guy was scared of someone and the kid happened to knock on the wrong door at the wrong time. It could be that he was overtired, neurotic, and shot out of aggravation or petulence, perhaps without intending to hit anyone. But then, this is for the court to decide. Otherwise, there remains a presumption of innocence in our court system, which many have forgotten here, and especially in the Press, who would take on the role of judge, jury, and executioner.

475 posted on 10/28/2003 9:36:53 AM PST by Smokin' Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 283 | View Replies]

To: Osage Orange
We always thought we were just being kids. Now mind you...we surely weren't 16 years of age either...We were 8 thru 13 yrs old..more than likely. I've almost said..."But for the grace of God, there go I". But...we live in way different times. And I don't think anyone would have pulled a gun on us..and shot us then.

We were being kids. In a day and age where murder and mayhem were not splattered all over the TV screen, when high schools shooting made reference to the team's standings in rifle competition, before car alarms, and when you (or your dad) could order a rifle or pistol by sending a check to Herter's and filling out the form and get it in the mail, provided you were old enough.

As you said, we live in way different times. It is to the great benefit of politicians and industry alike to keep the people frightened and then produce the 'solutions' to the prooblems, which commonly they themselves create.

Columbine massacres, babies in dumpsters, widespread hard drug use, even street gangs were alien concepts to most of America until the Media brought all the bloody ills of the world into your living room. As we perceive ourselves, we will be. The pollsters best understand the self-fulfilling nature of their prophesies, by morphing the debate farther and farther away from what used to be regarded as traditional values.

Simply enough, the Press can't stand absolutes such as "abortion is murder" or homosexuality is an abombination to God", so they attack the core Judeo-Christian values which used to apply, at the very least in appearance, and continue to present aberrations of humanity as normal, everyday events instead of the horrorshows they are. Peoples' expectations change as well. The ability to shock someone over mothers dumping babies in trash cans wrapped in plastic has faded, so they need some more abberant headline, and our culture's perception of itself slides down thee scale another notch.

In reality, there are a lot of decent folks out there, doing their best, and the 'if it bleeds-it leads' headline fodder is the exception, not the rule. But some people do not realize this and will view the world around them with what has become a culturally acceptable level of paranoia, as others will play into that, drawn by the revenues to be made from 'protecting' the masses, or the empowerment of intimidation and lure of easy lucre.

I detected clear undertones of anti-gun sentiment in the tone of article, a media favorite because an unarmed populace is easily intimidated.

One of the things the media have changed (for the worse) is the perception that each generation is somehow a new wave of aliens, rather than our offspring, or our offspring's offspring. Beyond the trimmings, people are people, as they have always been, and human nature applies. Kids push the envelope, try outrageous modes of dress, tatoos, piercings (used to be just ears), different buzzwords and ways to talk, fast cars, a beer, cigarettes, etc. Welcome to Growing Up and Figuring Out Your Place in the World (and the local pecking order) 101. Hopefully, you will survive. Sorry, forget the Leave-it-to-Beaver reruns, the rules have changed....

Sorry about the rant, I just needed to say that.

If us ol' geezers want to push that pendulum back, it is time to start befriending and mentoring the younger generation, not viewing them with unwarranted derision and suspicion.

476 posted on 10/28/2003 10:20:03 AM PST by Smokin' Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies]

To: lifacs
Gun safety instructors around here let you know that if you use a gun to defend yourself that you will be exchanging a big problem with a smaller problem.

But you will still have a problem.

The homeowner used very poor judgement.
477 posted on 10/28/2003 10:33:35 AM PST by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #478 Removed by Moderator

To: durham62
For the rest of my life and the rest of the lives of my classmates we will always be rethinking our decisions so that we never intentionally put our friends and family through the distress of losing a loved one like Mark

Unfortunately, it seems that someone, somewhere will have to pay the price for another generation of kids learning what not to do. I am neither condeming nor exonerating the homeowner (that is for the court to decide), just saying that in some instances actions have unforseen and tragic consequences.

It seems that every year someone was hurt or killed where and when I grew up, sometimes by the most innocuous acts. The rest of us learned that there are things we should not do as older and nearly adult people. As painful as this is, I hope the good that comes out of it is that people think ahead and realize when their actions could lead to calamity, and proceed accordingly. Note I am speaking of Adults as well as Teenagers. It only takes a few moments of stupidity to have a tragedy, or, like my friend's mom used to say "It is always fun until someone gets their eye put out."

I am sorry you lost your friend, and for the grief it has brought you all. I am sure Mr Levin is suffering in his own personal Hell as well.

479 posted on 10/28/2003 10:43:41 AM PST by Smokin' Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 364 | View Replies]

To: EricOKC
Which is exactly what he got.
480 posted on 10/28/2003 10:43:49 AM PST by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 478 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460461-480481-500501-520 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson