Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: floriduh voter
If a lingering death process isn't fully covered by insurance or medicare, whatever, the payment for extended treatment will come out of the person's estate. So if the person stands to gain from an inheritance, it would be difficult to remain completely neutral.
1,540 posted on 10/28/2003 8:21:25 AM PST by Aliska
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1513 | View Replies ]


To: Aliska
If a lingering death process isn't fully covered by insurance or medicare, whatever, the payment for extended treatment will come out of the person's estate. So if the person stands to gain from an inheritance, it would be difficult to remain completely neutral.

Your comment brings up the most important aspect of this case: Why is Michael Schiavo still guardian of Terry? It was understandable in the beginning, but when he started working towards his wife's death, well, it just doesn't make sense why a judge hasn't removed him as guardian, especially when the parents are begging for the job.

Until Michael Schiavo is removed as guardian this case will never end.

And it just doesn't make any sense to have him be the guardian when he stands to benefit from Terry's death, which he, by word and deed, is actively promoting.

There's something very very wrong with the actions of the judge(s) in this case.

1,962 posted on 10/28/2003 8:24:39 PM PST by Auntie Mame (Why not go out on a limb, isn't that where the fruit is?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1540 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson