[Catspaw]

With a GAL expected to be named shortly, there will be hearings and possibly another trial. Ms. Iyer, or Ms. Sauer, as she calls herself now, may well have a chance to testify.

However, the vast majority of witnesses go over their testimony with the attorney representing one side, in Iyer/Sauer's case, with the Schindler attorneys. Some of those lawyers will review the affidavit and toss out practice questions so that person knows what to anticipate on the stand. What few witnesses know is what the other side's attorney is going to ask and they don't anticipate those questions. In Iyer/Sauer's case, after Felos or another Schiavo attorney greets her with pleasantries and circles around her like a Great White, there's one specific area of her affidavit which will allow the Schiavo attorney questioning to tear her to shreds on the stand. I'll leave it to you to figure out what it is.

[drlevy88]

Certainly if you never state what you would assert is wrong with Ms. Sauer's affidavit, nobody can dispute you.

[drlevy88]

Certainly if you never state what you would assert is wrong with Ms. Sauer's affidavit, nobody can dispute you.

[drlevy88]

Certainly if you never state what you would assert is wrong with Ms. Sauer's affidavit, nobody can dispute you.

[drlevy88]

Certainly if you never state what you would assert is wrong with Ms. Sauer's affidavit, nobody can dispute you.

[drlevy88]

Certainly if you never state what you would assert is wrong with Ms. Sauer's affidavit, nobody can dispute you.

[drlevy88]

Certainly if you never state what you would assert is wrong with Ms. Sauer's affidavit, nobody can dispute you.

[secretagent]

1) Mr. Schiavo had the power to force the staff to break the law, because they feared for their jobs. He could have them fired and put a mark on their records that would have hindered their employment elsewhere as well.

And yet he says self damning remarks that many of the staff witnessed and could have used against him, thus doing the right thing and the legal thing. And the practical thing as well, since they risked not working again if they broke the law in conspiracy with Schiavo.

2) Mr.Schiavo had the power to remove staff, yet tolerated Sauer writing notes on the charts that threatened his plan to hasten Terri's death.

Tolerated his biggest enemy, her, for over a year. Hard to believe.