To: tsomer
" Suppose the contract company is in effect a shell corporation set up by the client company in order to insulate itself from these liabilities? Suppose company memos are found that establish this?" That's what I'm thinking. There's more to this story and I hope it all comes out.
194 posted on
10/23/2003 11:47:55 AM PDT by
Badray
(Molon Labe!)
To: Badray; tsomer
I imagine that the facts will come out in the investigation. Supposing is a dangerous as evidence. We can only go by what is known at present. At present we know that the people were employed by a contractor. To suppose that the contractor is a sub company of Walmart is more silly that supposing the contractor is owned by the DNC. The DNC is using the low cost of labor to fund the 2004 campaign, I suppose ; )
202 posted on
10/23/2003 11:55:24 AM PDT by
Conspiracy Guy
(Taglines are for the curious to read and the talented to write. Would someone write me one?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson