Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: floriduh voter
However, if she isn't terminal, why is she back at Hospice?

It's not so much she is terminal, it is that they don't have in place a plan or option for rehab.....yet. They won't just keep her in the hospital if they can only do the same thing a hospice can. If the guardian (Michael) doesn't want to take care of her at his home, then he can move her to a hospice. It doesn't mean she is terminal (necessarily), but that it is being used as a "care facility".

650 posted on 10/22/2003 7:38:42 PM PDT by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 616 | View Replies ]


To: floriduh voter
roflm*o -- ok, now let me see if I can find those names somewhere for ya. was hoping that info would magically be here already.
874 posted on 10/22/2003 8:41:45 PM PDT by cyn (http://www.terrisfight.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 650 | View Replies ]

To: RedBloodedAmerican
"If the guardian (Michael) doesn't want to take care of her at his home, then he can move her to a hospice."

Perish the thought. He would probably LOVE that opportunity. Then he could arrange for her anticipated demise at his leisure.

1,276 posted on 10/23/2003 12:44:32 AM PDT by sweetliberty ("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 650 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson