To: floriduh voter
However, if she isn't terminal, why is she back at Hospice? It's not so much she is terminal, it is that they don't have in place a plan or option for rehab.....yet. They won't just keep her in the hospital if they can only do the same thing a hospice can. If the guardian (Michael) doesn't want to take care of her at his home, then he can move her to a hospice. It doesn't mean she is terminal (necessarily), but that it is being used as a "care facility".
To: floriduh voter
roflm*o -- ok, now let me see if I can find those names somewhere for ya. was hoping that info would magically be here already.
874 posted on
10/22/2003 8:41:45 PM PDT by
cyn
(http://www.terrisfight.org)
To: RedBloodedAmerican
"If the guardian (Michael) doesn't want to take care of her at his home, then he can move her to a hospice." Perish the thought. He would probably LOVE that opportunity. Then he could arrange for her anticipated demise at his leisure.
1,276 posted on
10/23/2003 12:44:32 AM PDT by
sweetliberty
("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson