It doesnt "bother [me] so much", as much as it stirs up the gullible into an emoitional tizzy based on a spin of the facts. Ummm....some might call that lying.
Read my post directly before this one.
But then again, since we have seen much worse (can you point me to a thread where the facts and truth were so skewed as this one?), I guess it's okay. It's all relative, isn't it?
I'll go back and look, esp at the guardian part. That is what irks me the most though. The senate thought this was important enough to add as an amendment but the judge says come back in 5 days. If a guardian was appointed which is in the bill then this stuff wouldn't be happening. You have a man that is desperate (and only he and the Lord know why) and spurred on by an aggressive lawyer. What did this judge think he would do? Make nice with the family and they all come back hugging and kissing?