[fiesti]

"Yeah if Terri is alive he can't go forward with his wedding"

Of course he could. All he would have to do would be to grant her a divorce. But wait, then he could not control weather she lives or dies or who can and cannot have access to her.

This guy needs to be looked at real hard. "


Oh normal people would do this. Scott Peterson could have gotten a divorce and had Amber or other woman but then there was money involved. Michael Petserson could have gotten a divorce and had his bi-sexual life but then there was money involved. These physcos only think of self and do not see any thing wrong in what they do

[cyn]

Yes . . . divorce and moving on is the obvious thing for the 'normal' person. Which I think we're agreeing here after all this Michael is NOT.

But in addition to greed or any need to cover up past abuse / neglect, the word is he 'can't' just divorce Terri. His new live-in girlfriend, w/one child and another one on the way, is Catholic. Apparently (I'm not kidding here) she wants this to be OK'd and legit by the Catholic church. Because Terri & MIchael's marriage was 'for better or for worse', Terri must be, well, dead for it to end. Then all is peachy keen for the two lovebirds. At least until he starts abusing her, calling her fat, etc.

I asked some Catholics at the vigil/protest about an annulment vs. divorce. The comment was, "You could probably get an annulment out of a vending machine in this area." But since marriage is 'for better or for worse' it doesn't really fly -- I had people on both sides of me talking about this, some disagreements -- except for this additional reason for Terri's demise.

Anyway, fyi.

[floriduh voter]

The story is that his fiance can't marry him if he divorces Terri but she can marry him if they starve her to death. She's a devout Catholic.