[Deo volente]

As I recall from reading the 1000's of posts since I found out about Terri (mid-August),
the terrible twosome hooked up in 1998, and the lawsuit followed immediately.

It's amazing that Michael could evince such concern for Terri before a jury UNDER OATH, promise to care for her for the rest of her life, win a large settlement, and several years later suddenly remember that in a casual conversation Terri said "no tubes for me", THEN hire the "right-to-die" lawyer, WHO just happened to be the CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD OF HOSPICE, where Terri has spent the last 3 years languishing, without ANY THERAPY, all because she may have mentioned in a casual conversation, "no tubes for me".

Truly amazing.

[sweetliberty]

Yep. I agree.

Have y'all read the article posted at #615? It's enough to make your blood run cold!

[EternalVigilance]

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1006264/posts

Very important thread about another infamous recent example of unconstitutional judicial activism, and some solutions for how we can begin to drive them back.

Pay special attention to U.S. Senator Allard's new bill in post #15...

[MSCASEY]

I would like to know how much life insurance is taken out on her? That is the big question now! Maybe that helped jar his memory that she wanted to die so he could collect more money!

The husband has declined to comment on whether there is an outstanding life insurance policy on his wife.

CNN correspondent John Zarrella contributed to this report.

MCD

[bonfire]

Off topic, but was Terri being treated for her eating disorder? If so, was she on the road to recovery? Was this disorder something she had recently developed, or had she been struggling with it for years?

Just curious as to what was going on before her "heart attack"

[ordinaryguy]

It boggles the mind.