To: mhking
When I was a kid in southeast Oklahoma, there was this big slab of sandstone near Heavener that was called the runestone. They've made a state park out of the area now, but if I remember correctly, they had dated those runes to around 800 AD.
If that's true, it's a pretty significant trashing to Columbus' claim of 'discovery.'
7 posted on
10/22/2003 6:53:35 AM PDT by
Treebeard
To: okchemyst
Scandinavians landed in the New World in 1362, 130 years before Columbus. Who made it first has never mattered. Who made it stick has always mattered.
To: okchemyst
My first wife (RIP) grew up around Heavener and Poteau, I took her back there to visit and we went and saw the Runestone together. She said most of the local people have no interest and she had never seen it before. If it is for real then my ancestors must have traveled extensively in the New World, Oklahoma is a long way from the East coast!
23 posted on
10/22/2003 7:15:18 AM PDT by
RipSawyer
(Mercy on a pore boy lemme have a dollar bill!)
To: Slicksadick; okchemyst; farmfriend; RightWhale
33 posted on
10/22/2003 9:56:24 AM PDT by
blam
To: okchemyst
I believe that a number of different people, including Europeans and Africans, maybe Arabs too, got here before Columbus. The date of his voyage, coming so soon after the invention of the printing press, made the critical difference in him getting the credit. He got the word out.
38 posted on
10/22/2003 10:26:29 AM PDT by
twigs
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson