Replies

Uh, DMWT, she did not say that he was disqualified from posting.

Here's what she said...

No, our positions are not weak, but like I said in my previous post: For those who believe, no explanation is necessary. For those who don't, none will suffice. Your problem is that you didn't do real research on this before you starte posting. For those of us seasoned with posting, knowing the FACTS, we find having to explain against your ignorant comments and analysis tiring. I have kids who listen better than you.

There have been many reasoned posts to Jorge that challenge and rebut his thesis. He elects to not answer those, instead answering many of the people who are frustrated with him and who, admittedly are lashing out.

I did not see as much personal attack in her message as I did frustration. I would not (having been on the forum for quite a few years) classify that particular post as a personal attack...but I'm not a moderator either.

Just my opinion.

BTW, what questions are you looking for reeasonable answers to as regards Terri?

As an attorney, I have seen the heartbreak associated with situations in which family members fail to obtain directives from loved ones prior to becoming incapacitated. I recently had a client who wanted to appoint her granddaughter as her guardian and conservator. Unfortunately, she could not do so voluntarily because her dementia took over before we could submit the application. Now she is facing an involuntary proceeding in which a court-ordered guardian ad litem will be appointed, contrary of course to her original wishes. All of this points out the necessity of planning for contingencies well ahead of when they might be needed.

I do not want to buy this argument of an executin judge or murderous husband until I have more facts. Is there a copy of Mr. Schiavo's application or the ruling of the district court granting Mr. Schiavo's request to withhold nutrition and hydration? Second, is there a legal chronology of this case? I cannot get ahold of anything that is unfiltered. Third, has anyone analyzed this case as it relates to the Cruzan case decided by the USSC over ten years ago?