[silly me]

He doesn't want any $$$ spent on her afraid that she'll be sufficiently recovered to drop a dime on his a** for attempted murder. Can't the legislature see that????
What's wrong with those people? I watched the debate in the House last night on the internet and those people arguing against her feeding tube reinstatement hiding behind the issue of "constitutionality". Well, I'm all for the Constitution being followed, but let's be real guys: can you picture Geo. Washington, or Thomas Jefferson or Madison saying, "Well, it's not what we intended with 'separation of powers'....IDIOTS! They need to get their collective heads outta their butts so they can see something.

And what's up with her parents? Why didn't they stage a Rambo-style raid on that hospice joint and rescue their daughter. That's what I would have done. NOTHING would stand between me and MY child, guardianship or NO guardianship. There's such a thing as the "right thing to do"....

Which is a bigger sin? Supposedly 'breaking the separation of powers' clause in the Florida or US Constitution or letting an innocent woman die when you COULD have done something about it?

AND JEB BUSH!!! He could have invoked EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE and intervened without the Legislature taking their good sweet time about doing something.

Yeah, he's the Knight on the White Horse now, but you watch his butt pucker come election time. He just might lose his seat.

[ellery]

What's the issue of Constitutionality here?

[supercat]

He doesn't want any $$$ spent on her afraid that she'll be sufficiently recovered to drop a dime on his a** for attempted murder. Can't the legislature see that????

If Terri lives long enough for a guardian ad litem to be appointed and request an audit of her trust, I'd think that might contain all the evidence needed for an attempted murder conviction.