Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Motherbear
So you wouldn't want your husband to be guardian? If you don't trust him, why did you marry him? Are your commitments really taken so frivolously that we should expect your mommy and daddy to remain in the ball game for you?
102 posted on 10/21/2003 5:25:41 PM PDT by Chancellor Palpatine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]


To: Chancellor Palpatine
IMHO, you are making straw man arguemnts that are extremely generalized in a situation where there were very specific issues that neghate those arguements.

If my spouse became captivated with dollar signs over my death, had moved in with and made babies with another individual while I lay in a disabled state, had not used the monies earmarked for my rehaibiltation appropriately, and was doing all in her power to see that I died...yes, I would hope and pray to God that my parents and friends would step in.

In such a case as this, the other spouse is the one who has already broken faith and treated the commitments not only frivoulously...but maliciously.

Thank God for the power of activism, for the power of prayer...and most importantly for the power of love...the love the parents have for their daughter which has stepped in when the love of the husband has so obviously failed.

Jeb Bush made good on this one...he deserves RICH and lasting credit for his leadership and actions IMHO. It will not be soon forgotten.

145 posted on 10/21/2003 5:40:10 PM PDT by Jeff Head
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

To: Chancellor Palpatine
So you wouldn't want your husband to be guardian? If you don't trust him, why did you marry him? Are your commitments really taken so frivolously that we should expect your mommy and daddy to remain in the ball game for you?

When a marital relationship is good, spouses are appropriate guardians for each other. Marital relations can go bad, however, and in such cases spouses may cease to be appropriate guardians.

Michael and Felos convinced the Schindlers to agree that Michael was an appropriate guardian, by telling them that it would increase the malpractice award that could be won for Terri's care. The Schindlers didn't realize what Schiavo/Felos had in mind when they made that request.

Unfortunately, once guardianship is acceeded, it's very hard to challenge it. Had Felos not been allowed to fire Terri's guardian ad litem, that person could (and likely would) have filed for divorce. Unfortunately, since Judge Greer refused to appoint another guardian ad litem (required if there's any possible conflict of interest between spouse and ward) nobody could recognize Terri in court.

149 posted on 10/21/2003 5:41:36 PM PDT by supercat (Why is it that the more "gun safety" laws are passed, the less safe my guns seem?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson