Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ClintonBeGone
The bill reads:

(b) The court has found that patient to be in a persistent vegetative state;

Hence, she doesn't need to be in a PVS. The court only needs to have declared that she is - which it has.

78 posted on 10/21/2003 5:32:35 AM PDT by ordinaryguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]


To: ordinaryguy
If non-PVS, the person would not be starved in the first place.
85 posted on 10/21/2003 5:39:13 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson