Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: VRWC_minion
"Either the rights of the employer or the rights of the employee are affected. There is no nuetral side."

You are completely insane. The employer makes an investment and offers to pay an individual a specified value in exchange for a service. The employee choses to either accept that offer or to decline that offer. See it can work without infringing on either parties rights.

Oh, I forgot, you don't think a waitperson is smart enough to decline the offer. We need to legislate protection for them because they aren't bright enough to make choices.
392 posted on 10/20/2003 1:39:05 PM PDT by CSM (Congrats to Flurry and LE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 382 | View Replies ]


To: CSM
Oh, I forgot, you don't think a waitperson is smart enough to decline the offer. We need to legislate protection for them because they aren't bright enough to make choices.

Except that every other employee in the state isn't required to make such a choice and every other businsess is required to ban smoking.

403 posted on 10/20/2003 1:56:13 PM PDT by VRWC_minion (Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 392 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson