Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: VRWC_minion
Banning smoking will lower my restaurant bill. Lower labor, maintenance and cleaning will save me money.
Then many bars would already ban smoking. The problem is that overhead (rent or mortgage/taxes, lights, heat, licensing) is not affected by the number of patrons. Less patrons means that each one either absorbs a greater share, or the owner does.

-Eric

132 posted on 10/20/2003 10:29:07 AM PDT by E Rocc (Collectivism is to freedom as raw sewage is to fresh water.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]


To: E Rocc
Then many bars would already ban smoking

The costs might be lower but as another poster pointed out the customers will drop off. That is why a state wide ban is needed so all restaurants are smoke free. That way the smokers will still eat at the same restaurants.

140 posted on 10/20/2003 10:35:32 AM PDT by VRWC_minion (Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson