To: inquest
So, had Bush put Terri's fight on the agenda, only a majority vote would have been needed? If Byrd introduced the bill, it would required 2/3 of both houses, but I presume that King could have still blocked it in the state senate. If true, Bush was undercutting Terri all along. Why would he do such?
To: Theodore R.
>>If true, Bush was undercutting Terri all along. Why would he do such?<<
Maybe he gets a cut of King's goodies.... NOTHING would surprise me anymore.
585 posted on
10/20/2003 3:58:57 PM PDT by
Humidston
(Do not remove this tag under penalty of law)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson