Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: All
Reuters ^ | 10-18-03

Posted on 10/18/2003 12:10 PM EDT by Brian S

Bin Laden Tells U.S. to Quit Iraq-Jazeera TV Sat October 18, 2003 11:50 AM ET

DUBAI (Reuters) - Arabic satellite television Al Jazeera said on Saturday al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden had sent an audio message advising the United States to quit Iraq.

The television has yet to broadcast the audio tape but made a text of it available to the media.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1003539/posts

38 posted on 10/18/2003 11:54:06 AM PDT by miltonim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: All
Two U.S. troops killed near Kirkuk

Other attackers strike U.S. truck near Fallujah, witnesses say


Iraqis from the restive town of Fallujah celebrate as a U.S. Army ammunition truck blazes. Witnesses said the vehicle had been hit with a rocket-propelled grenade in an ambush.

FALLUJAH, Iraq, Oct. 19 — Two U.S. soldiers were killed and one was wounded in an ambush north of Baghdad, the military reported Sunday, and insurgents attacked a convoy in this turbulent city west of the capital, setting off huge explosions in several vehicles.

YOUNG IRAQIS here cheered and danced with each explosion and motorists sounded their horns in an apparent celebration of the attack.

In a third incident, three apparent Iraqi attackers were also reported killed.

There were no reports of casualties in the Sunday morning attack against what appeared to be a U.S. ammunition truck here in Fallujah, 35 miles west of Baghdad in the “Sunni Triangle.”

Dozens of Iraqi youths cheered and danced in celebration as contents of the flaming vehicles continued to explode. Witnesses said U.S. troops came under subsequent attack with rocket-propelled grenades as they tried to approach the truck and withdrew.

U.S. troops and Iraqi police kept journalists away from the scene, but from a distance it appeared that three American vehicles, including at least one truck and one Humvee, were ablaze.

There were conflicting reports whether the attack in the eastern end of the city was triggered by a roadside bomb or by rocket-propelled grenades.

Saturday’s deaths came barely a day after four American soldiers were killed in a roadside explosion in Baghdad and a clash with Shiite Muslim gunmen in the southern shrine city of Karbala, on the deadliest day for the occupation force in a month.

Excerpted http://www.msnbc.com/news/870749.asp?0cv=CB10

62 posted on 10/19/2003 11:15:52 AM PDT by miltonim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: All
     Question #14235: Ruling on Muslims taking on European nationality


Question :

What is the ruling on taking European nationality for a Muslim who has come to a European country fleeing from oppression in his homeland, where he has lost his identity papers and has lost all hope of going back to his country? May Allaah reward you with good?

Answer :
Praise be to Allaah.  

In order to answer this question, we must explain two things.

 1 – Whether settling in a kaafir country is permissible

2 – Establishing whether there is a need to take the nationality.

 With regard to the first matter, settling in a kaafir country is not permissible unless the following conditions are met:

       1-     There should be a legitimate need for settling in their country, which cannot be met in the Muslim lands, such as trade, da’wah, officially representing a Muslim country, or seeking knowledge that is not available in a Muslim country either because it does not exist there, or what is available is not of good quality. Or there should be fear of death, prison or torture, not mere harassment, for oneself or for one’s family and children, or fear for one’s wealth.

2-     Settling there should be regarded as temporary, not permanent. It is not permissible to have the intention of staying there permanently; rather one should have the idea that it is temporary, because settling there permanently means that one has migrated (made hijrah) from the land of Islam to the land of kufr. This clearly goes against the ruling of sharee’ah that it is obligatory to migrate from the land of kufr to the land of Islam. Having the intention of staying there temporarily means that when the need to stay in the kaafir country no longer applies, one will get up and leave.

3-     The kaafir country in which one wants to settle should be one which is at peace with the Muslims, not one which is at war with them. Otherwise it is not permissible to settle there. A country is regarded as being at war with the Muslims if it is hostile towards the Muslims.

4-     There should be religious freedom in the kaafir country, so that the Muslim will be able to practise his religion openly.

5-     He should be able to learn the laws of Islam in that country; if it is difficult for him to do so then it is not permissible for him to settle there because that implies that he is turning away from learning the religion of Allaah.

6-     He should think it most likely that he will be able to protect and maintain his religious commitment, and that of his family and children, otherwise it is not permissible for him to settle there, because preserving one’s religious commitment takes precedence over preserving one’s self, one’s wealth and one’s family. Whoever meets this condition – and how difficult it is to meet it – is permitted to settle in the land of the kuffaar, otherwise that is forbidden to him, because of the texts which clearly forbid settling there and enjoin migrating from such lands, as is well known, and because of the great danger which that poses to religion and morals, which no one can deny except one who is arrogant.

Secondly: there should be a legitimate need for taking the nationality, such as the benefits for which the Muslim has settled in the kaafir country being dependent upon his taking the nationality. Otherwise that is not permissible for him, because taking the nationality is an obvious manifestation of befriending the kuffaar, and because it involves speaking words which it is not permissible to believe in or adhere to, such as approving of kufr or man-made laws. Moreover, taking the nationality may lead to staying in the kaafir land permanently, which is not permissible, as stated above. Having established these two points, I hope that Allaah will forgive the Muslims who settle in kaafir lands for the great danger that they have exposed themselves to, because either he is forced to settle there and necessity makes permissible that which is ordinarily forbidden, or to serve an interest which outweighs the harms. And Allaah knows best. 


Shaykh Khaalid al-Maajid, Faculty Member, College of Sharee’ah, Imaam Muhammad ibn Sa’ood Islamic University. (www.islam-qa.com)

http://63.175.194.25/index.php?ln=eng&ds=qa&lv=browse&QR=14235&dgn=4


94 posted on 10/20/2003 10:08:03 PM PDT by miltonim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: All
Mother of 7 held in bomb plot.

"A 40-year-old mother of seven children from Nablus was one of three Palestinians arrested by soldiers and Shin Bet agents on Monday for attempting a suicide bombing in Rosh Ha'ayin, security sources said Tuesday."

139 posted on 12/10/2003 9:04:40 AM PST by PsyOp ( Citizenship ought to be reserved for those who carry arms. - Aristotle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: All
Report: Islamic militants ran 7 recruitment camps in France

"Islamic radicals held training camps for potential recruits across France through 2002, Le Parisien newspaper reported Wednesday, adding that French investigators believe they have successfully dismantled the network running the camps."

140 posted on 12/10/2003 9:14:29 AM PST by PsyOp (You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say will be misquoted and used against you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: All
The power of the extremist Wahhabi form of Islam in the United States was created with generous Saudi financing of American Muslim communities over the past few decades. Over 80 percent of the mosques in the United States "have been radicalized by Saudi money and influence," Barsky said.

Before the 1970s, she explained, "Muslim immigrants who came to the United States would build a store-front mosque somewhere. Then, since the 1970s, the Saudis have been approaching these mosques and telling them it wasn't proper for the glory of Islam to build such small mosques."

For many Muslims, it seemed the Saudis were offering a free mosque. However, Barsky believes for each mosque they invested in, the Saudis sent along their own imam (teacher-cleric).

"These [immigrants] were not interested in this [Wahhabi] ideology, and suddenly they have a Saudi imam coming in and telling them they're not praying properly and not practicing Shari'a [Islamic law] properly." This Saudi strategy was being carried out "all over the world, from America to Bangladesh," with the Saudis investing $70-80 billion in the endeavor over three decades.

Saudi America-How the Saudis have radicalized U.S. mosques

245 posted on 12/12/2005 4:06:19 PM PST by PsyOp (The commonwealth is theirs who hold the arms.... - Aristotle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson