Replies

'Uh Judge, to be honest with you I tried to kill her, but now she's only in a coma. But I can get my sister and friend to swear that she said that if the time ever came where she was in a coma she would rather starve and die of thirst.'

Your comments would be true if and only if you believed what I copied and pasted above.

What if the husband was believed to be truthful.

Would you allow him to make that decision then?

And BTW, where are the statements of defense against these personal attacks he has been taking? I looked for some archived stuff and all I could find were more character attacks and repeats of the same which all stemmed from the other side of this issue.

This is so, so one sided.

I wasn't speaking specifically of this womasn husband although in the spirit of disclosure I think he's a scumbag.

I was speaking in generalites.

However, I could care less if it is one sided. The state should not be issuing death warrants in America when there is no living will or written and informed consent. Judges are not Gods and where you egt the idea that they are is beyond me. Nothing in writing, no starvation and dehydration when there are disputes amongst both family members and Doctors.

Think about it, Governor Bush orders that a murderer on death row be starved and dehydrated in fulfillment of his death sentence. How long before the ACLU is screaming cruel and unusual punishment?