It is ambigious.
When did Michael first state that those were her wishes? Does anyone know? I am curious if it was before, during, or after the civil trial for damages.
It is speculated often that he made the claim after the civil case, does anyone know if that is factually supported. I think that would have been a key fact.
(I have to say, as one who would support anothers right to die, I am turned off from Teri's case my the many who throw false and over the top accusations at anyone who might think otherwise. The notion that Teri did actually express her wishes to her husband and that she would have not wanted this type of care - and he is fighting for what she actually wanted does not even seem to be a consideration or a possibility. I think there are many here who would not agree even if those were her wishes and are using this case to promote their own causes.)