To: r9etb
There is also the subtle blurring of "seeking to purchase" and "purchased" uranium. Huge difference. And the answer to those questions are "yes" and "probably not."
14 posted on
10/17/2003 7:06:19 AM PDT by
justshutupandtakeit
(America's Enemies foreign and domestic agree: Bush must be destroyed.)
To: justshutupandtakeit; Wolfstar; dirtboy; Shermy; Grampa Dave
There is also the subtle blurring of "seeking to purchase" and "purchased" uranium. Huge difference. And the answer to those questions are "yes" and "probably not." And Bush said "sought", not "bought".
It now comes out that even the CIA's summary of Wilson's own report inferentially corroborates and supports Bush's statement:
According to an official CIA summary of Mr. Wilson's report, released last summer, Mr. Wilson did report that one former Niger official told him he had been urged by an unidentified businessman to meet with an Iraqi trade delegation in June 1999. The former official interpreted that overture as an invitation to discuss uranium sales.
The book contract and movie deal for Joe and Valerie appear to be receding into the distance as we speak...
34 posted on
10/18/2003 11:43:05 PM PDT by
okie01
(www.ArmorforCongress.com...because Congress isn't for the morally halt and the mentally lame.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson