[agrace]

Huh? How did I chastise you? I would have thought your skin was thicker after all the arguing you've done on this thread, rather than to consider "Your assumption is a bit of a stretch I think" chastisement.

I still don't get your beef and I've pretty much caught up with this thread's overnight shenanigans.

But more currently - why are you seeking to blame the parents? Are they responsible for a faulty judicial system? Did they have a say in the fact that this inexpicably one-sided judge was assigned their case? Should they have anticipated that their son-in-law, who claimed to want to take care of his wife forever, would turn 180 degrees once the medical trust - money awarded based on his deceitful testimony - was in his bank account?

Honestly, what's your general point in all this? I'd really like to understand.

[strela]

I stand by my previous statements on this case, and have more profitable things to do today than to hang around here. Good day.

[honeygrl]

"Honestly, what's your general point in all this? I'd really like to understand."

Maybe it is just the murderers wife trolling the thread.