Replies

There was a substantial amount of money set aside to provide this particular US citizen's basic needs (f & w).

I don't care if Bill Gates steps forward and promises to pay the freight for the poor woman for the rest of her life. At what point do you finally say "enough" and grant her release from her hell on earth? The state of Florida has laws that answer that question, and as far as I can see, they have been applied as fairly and even-handedly as is possible under the circumstances.

Anyway, what on earth do you think food stamps are for?

Uhhh, "food stamps" are government benefits.

The court has forbidden everyone concerned with this woman to even feed her a spoonful of Jello. What the heck are they worried about? She might choke and die < /sarcasm>?

Being non-responsive, she could very well aspirate a spoonful of Jello and die of pneumonia. If you were the one attempting to feed her a spoonful of Jello, would you be willing to step forward and be brought up on charges if you killed her in such a way?

I'll ask again - at what point do you finally say "enough" and grant her release from her hell on earth?

"Uhhh, "food stamps" are government benefits. "

YOU are the one that brought up the strawman of governmental responsibility for feeding all US citizens.

I'll ask again - at what point do you finally say "enough" and grant her release from her hell on earth?

How do you know she wants to die?

>>The court has forbidden everyone concerned with this woman to even feed her a spoonful of Jello. What the heck are they worried about? She might choke and die < /sarcasm>?

Being non-responsive, she could very well aspirate a spoonful of Jello and die of pneumonia. If you were the one attempting to feed her a spoonful of Jello, would you be willing to step forward and be brought up on charges if you killed her in such a way? <<

She's going to die, if the courts have their way. What's the difference. Is the person who actually removed the feeding tube a perfectly innocent bystander? Not in my book. He or she may just as well have put a bullet in her brain.

>>I'll ask again - at what point do you finally say "enough" and grant her release from her hell on earth?<<

Since I have not mastered the trick of walking on water, I think I'll leave her "release from hell on earth" up to the Being more supreme than you or I.

Until that time, she should be allowed unrestricted visits from her parents, the people who truly love her, and who bring her happiness and comfort. She should be allowed to have rehabilitative therapy, and then, her "hell on earth" might, just might, not be so bad in time.

I don't care if Bill Gates steps forward and promises to pay the freight for the poor woman for the rest of her life. At what point do you finally say "enough" and grant her release from her hell on earth?

At what point did you become God, with the right to overrule her will to live?

When they told her that they were going to kill her if she didn't prove to them that she was human, she became extremely agitated, frightened, and tried to get out of her chair.

She does NOT want to die!

The claim that she does want to die is a LIE, promulgated by her unfaithful "husband".

When she did have her own legal representation, her attorney said that her husband should NOT be allowed to decide for her death, because of his obvious conflict of interest.

So what happened? Her counsel was dismissed by the court, and was not replaced -- leaving the "husband" in charge of her life -- and her death.

The fix has been in for quite some time. This is a filthy, corrupt, vile situation. Anyone who stands up for it is either ignorant, or beneath contempt.

Oh, one last thing: you plonked me, remember? So I trust you will NOT be replying to this.