Replies

And my statement is not a strawman, you take on faith that what you believe is true, you have no evidence that the bible is correct in any form.

Science on the other hand, looks at the evidence it has and builds a hypothesis from it, there will necassarily be we believe, or this might have, or this probably, etc, etc, because science will never claim inerrancy.

I found the whole article fascinating to read, and the could haves and might haves will get other scientists working on it as well and either build upon the hypothesis or destroy it.

This is the way science works, yeah, it makes the "Why" people absolutely nuts, because science to you is guessing the how's with insufficient evidence, but that is why it is called a hypothesis.

The "why" and "how" of us in this crowd find the hypothesis fascinating, and wish to discuss it, you wish to blow it off as wishful thinking, which tells me that you have no idea what science really does.

You are a "why" person, whereas we are the How and why people. I find your statements amusing, nothing more.