I would ignore you now except for this:
You are not interested in honest debate and I am not interested in dishonest debate.
I challenge you to show where I have been dishonest on this thread! Your claims and assertions have been shown to be false (Iliad and Odyssey false comparison) and for this I am dishonest?
You are less than irrelevant, you are an insult to HONEST discourse.
The Iliad and the Odyssey are FICTION written around an historical event; the sacking of Troy.
This is a dissembling obfuscation. One could just as easily state that the Testaments are FICTION written around historical events. You are the one that previously asserted that because no great inaccuracies have been proven in the historical elements, this then somehow establishes the veracity of the mythological embellishments.
The Iliad & the Odyssey are not by any stretch crucial to this analogy. Indeed, any historical fiction would suffice to establish the same point. That point being, no matter how many facts are accurate, they do not establish the accuracy of additional facts for which no evidence exists.
Here are two examples on either extreme:
1) A ten volume history of the world includes one sentence stating: "Krishna made it so." The accuracy of the other 999.9% of the work does not make that sentence accurate as well.
2) An epic mythological saga describing a cosmic battle of deities includes one sentence stating: "The mountains of Scandinavia trembled." The accuracy of that statement (there is indeed a Scandinavia, which features mountains, which do 'tremble'..) does not establish the accuracy of the remaining 999.9% of the work.
Both previous examples - the Homeric poems and the Hebrew testaments - merely fall somewhere between these two extremes.