To: <1/1,000,000th%
No, this is the goal of scientific objectivity. It's not the goal of scientists who will only accept conclusions that don't involve God.
God can't be proven by science, therefore God doesn't exist. Which of these two competing factions is God... the scientist or the supreme being?
37 posted on
10/16/2003 8:26:01 AM PDT by
pgyanke
("The Son of God became a man to enable men to become sons of God" - C.S. Lewis)
To: pgyanke
It's not the goal of scientists who will only accept conclusions that don't involve God. Strawman argument. This statement of yours is not true.
Just because scientists' description of their work doesn't explicitly mention God, doesn't mean they don't believe in God.
To: pgyanke
God can't be proven by science, therefore God doesn't exist. Which of these two competing factions is God... the scientist or the supreme being? Science doesn't try to prove or disprove the existence of God. By His very nature, God exists outside of the realm of the natural. If God followed scientific rules and could be classified as Homo Sapien Divinis or somesuch, he wouldn't be God- he's just be a powerful being with no divine properties.
155 posted on
10/16/2003 12:20:41 PM PDT by
Modernman
("In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women."-Homer)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson