Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Right Wing Professor
I have no idea what you think your point is.

Really professor? How about this, evolution is religion.

And finally, since you have yet again failed to provide a specific example of a piece of evidence for a deity, can I take it that you have withdrawn your claim that such evidence exists?

No but you can take it that I ignored responding knowing that any 'evidence' I give would not be deemed suitable for your consideration. But here goes:

Psalms 19:1  The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament sheweth his handywork.

Romans 1:19  Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them.
20  For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:

Remember, evidence not proof.

138 posted on 10/16/2003 11:57:55 AM PDT by asformeandformyhouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]


To: asformeandformyhouse
For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen,Like what?
141 posted on 10/16/2003 12:00:49 PM PDT by JethroHathAWay (without the cape I would not be able to fly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies ]

To: asformeandformyhouse
How about this, evolution is religion.

Then how come there are Christian evolutionists? Do they have two religions? Can one be a Hindu and a Catholic simultaneously? If not, and evolution is a religion, then why can one simultaneously be a Catholic and an evolutionist?

No but you can take it that I ignored responding knowing that any 'evidence' I give would not be deemed suitable for your consideration

So your evidence is three verses from the Bible? OK...

143 posted on 10/16/2003 12:09:01 PM PDT by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies ]

To: asformeandformyhouse
Using the Bible to prove the existence of God is like using the Lord of the Rings to prove the existence of orcs -- in other words, it's a kind of circular reasoning.

If this had been an actual debate, you would have been instructed to go back and find additonal evidence to support your point. We now return you to your regularly-scheduled crevo thread.

199 posted on 10/16/2003 1:29:06 PM PDT by Junior (Kinky is using a feather. Sick is using the whole chicken.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson