1 posted on
10/16/2003 7:33:44 AM PDT by
AntiGuv
To: PatrickHenry
Ping!
2 posted on
10/16/2003 7:33:58 AM PDT by
AntiGuv
(When the countdown hits zero, something's gonna happen..)
To: AntiGuv
Too many events had to happen in just the right circumstance, time and sequence.
To: AntiGuv
Wow! The author managed to write that article without mentioning Global Warming even once.
To: AntiGuv
The timing of such events has implications for the search for intelligent life in space, he says. I submit that they wouldn't know intelligent life if it came up and bit them in glutes. Why is it so much more plausible to believe that life is just a cosmic boo boo than to believe that we actually have a purpose ordained by our Creator?
6 posted on
10/16/2003 7:42:44 AM PDT by
pgyanke
("The Son of God became a man to enable men to become sons of God" - C.S. Lewis)
To: AntiGuv
"He also adds that there is an intriguing implication from his research which suggests that had the conditions been only slightly different, the Cambrian Explosion could have occurred two billion years earlier."
Or life could have started 6000 years ago as the bible indicates.
Sure is a lot of 'guess work' in 'tried and true' science.
8 posted on
10/16/2003 7:51:28 AM PDT by
Bigh4u2
To: AntiGuv
"We believe that there was a change in the environment - a slow cooling of the system - that caused positive feedback that allowed the conditions for complex life," Dr von Bloh told BBC News Online. Sounds like religion to me. Consider the number of times this article has the words "may be", "might have" or "could" in it( 7 ). But if one happens to 'believe' differently than this esteemed Doctor, they'd be considered an ignorant, backward fundamentalist.
To: AntiGuv
Life did not really start until Hostess developed the twinkie
13 posted on
10/16/2003 7:56:33 AM PDT by
woofie
(I want to die peacefully in my sleep like Grandpa ...not screaming,like the passengers in his car)
To: AntiGuv
But what actually caused the Cambrian Explosion is unknown. Personally, I think it's rather simple. I believe that all the oxygen sinks present on Earth were finally filled, allowing sufficient atmospheric oxygen for larger animals to form.
27 posted on
10/16/2003 8:11:19 AM PDT by
dirtboy
(Cure Arnold of groping - throw him into a dark closet with Janet Reno and shut the door.)
To: AntiGuv
New research suggests it may have occurred because....Scientists say the life explosion might just have easily occurred two billion years earlier - or not at all.....
They suggest ...
We believe that there was a change...
It might have been a continental break-up, or even an asteroid impact....
If so, then the Earth would have been ....
early explosion would have meant that by now the Earth could have developed..
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++
No religious beliefs required...yes evolution is pure science... Of course, I MAY be wrong...
48 posted on
10/16/2003 8:50:41 AM PDT by
HalfFull
To: AntiGuv
An early explosion would have meant that by now the Earth could have developed far more advanced intelligent creatures than humans. Still looking for gods, I see.
To: AntiGuv
"We believe that there was a change in the environment - a slow cooling of the system - that caused positive feedback that allowed the conditions for complex life," Dr von Bloh told BBC News Online.
Using a computer model.... Some more evo 'fact free science'. They do not know what the earth was like before, during or after, so that's good, because it makes any nonsense they say possible.
Jeech, can't these people get a real job?
267 posted on
10/17/2003 7:17:55 PM PDT by
gore3000
("To say dogs, mice, and humans are all products of slime plus time is a mystery religion.")
To: AntiGuv
So, what horribly-mutated branch of this Tree of Life resulted in the creation of government parasites?
276 posted on
10/18/2003 12:34:28 AM PDT by
Hank Rearden
(Dick Gephardt. Before he dicks you.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson