To: ambrose
When it comes to Rush and pills, an analagous situation would be Reagan and guns. After Reagan got shot, what an opportunity to change that debate on guns! What the hell is that supposed to mean?
5 posted on
10/14/2003 4:09:23 PM PDT by
LisaFab
To: LisaFab
It means typical equivocating...liberals live by that mantra and conservatives only slightly less so.
10 posted on
10/14/2003 4:14:58 PM PDT by
wardaddy
To: LisaFab
"When it comes to Rush and pills, an analagous situation would be Reagan and guns. After Reagan got shot, what an opportunity to change that debate on guns!
What the hell is that supposed to mean?"
It means Regean should have BANNED ALL GUNS, after he got shot.
My goodness, that's not a very libertarian postition for Maher, who claims to be a "Libertarian".
And the "Libertarian" Maher is also for Big Government, higher taxes, and an array of EnviroWacko policies.
Oh well, this Asshole is going to be SOOOOOOOO Disappointed next year when Bush Nukes Dean, just like when he was pouting on CNN after the 2002 elections hehehehe...!
19 posted on
10/14/2003 4:17:30 PM PDT by
Pubbie
(Vote "No" On Recall, "Yes" On Bustamante)
To: LisaFab
What the hell is that supposed to mean?
You got me. I was almost nodding in agreement until that line.
I fail to see how ending the WOD is analogous to getting rid of the second article of the Bill of Rights.
90 posted on
10/14/2003 5:25:07 PM PDT by
dyed_in_the_wool
("I don't know how you survived, slave. It doesn't matter. Prepare to terminate." -- Sark)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson