To: Hemingway's Ghost
Why not relegalization?I understand your points on the issue.
I am just not convinced that society as a whole would not be damaged even further by legalization.
other countries experiments with this have not seemed to work well. Although, this country is not like them in many ways.
Maybe or maybe not seems to be the results and I cannot say which is correct.
228 posted on
10/15/2003 2:08:31 PM PDT by
Cold Heat
("It is easier for an ass to succeed in that trade than any other." [Samuel Clemens, on lawyers])
To: wirestripper; *Wod_list
Why not relegalization? Criminalization hasn't solved the problem. Arguably it can't. Arguably, the criminalization of drug usage and drug distribution (certain types) has led to the erosion of privacy, the expansion of government at all levels, and the amount of money spent by all levels of government, requiring higher taxes. How is supporting the erosion of rights, the expansion of government, and higher taxes a valid conservative stance?I am just not convinced that society as a whole would not be damaged even further by legalization.
It is likeliest that under relegalization, more people would harm themselves with drugs. But preventing self-harm cannot justify our imposing on others the harms of drug criminalization.
229 posted on
10/15/2003 2:20:12 PM PDT by
MrLeRoy
(The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. - Jefferson)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson