Posted on 10/14/2003 4:04:21 PM PDT by ambrose
A fair number of Independents could be lured in, or back to, the Democratic Party. For me, a litmus test for that would have to be confronting the Drug War, and as I see the media and the Democratic presidential contenders both taking a huge whiff on the opportunity the Rush Limbaugh story provides, I am not encouraged.
For many years, I've been asked 'why do you read the Enquirer?' and have always said, "because I want to know what's going to be in the New York Times next week."
So, a week after I read the Limbaugh story in the Enquirer I read the rehash of it today in the Times, and again: Media, Pols, hello! If any time was the perfect time to make the case about the massive double standard that is the Drug War, this is it. Rush tearfully talks about his addition to a "medication." Yeah, well everybody likes their "medication" in different forms, pally. It would be funny, but substantially the same thing, if on the 6:30 news they sold bourbon and had the voice intone, "Ask your doctor if Jack Daniels is right for you."
Or pot or whatever it is that mixes better with your body chemistry. Because that's all the Drug War is, persecuting people with a different body chemistry than Plan A. Why does one person like scotch, and another loathes it and likes vodka? Or one like cocaine, and another Metabolife?
Who gives a f**k, that's why. The bottom line is, we all pick our poison and shouldn't arbitrarily punish and shame some, and accept and coddle others. There's nothing about preferring the high from oxycontin or liquor or speed (caffeine, ephedra, etc - speed, the drug America really loves) that makes you morally superior to people who like pot or mushrooms or even heroin for that matter, because that's what Oxycontin is, heroin in a pill. Gee, no wonder it's popular.
When it comes to Rush and pills, an analagous situation would be Reagan and guns. After Reagan got shot, what an opportunity to change that debate on guns! Who could argue about at least debating it while he lay in the hospital from a gunshot wound - like how JFK's program got passed so easily after his assassination, or even Bush's after 911.
But Reagan whiffed. Rush has the chance to change America for the better here. But it must involve his admitting the fundamental truths about drugs:
A: Almost all Americans do them, legal or otherwise; B: It's wrong to inconsistently treat fact A.
And Rush, if you don't see it that way yet, let me put it like this: When you're furtively meeting people in parking lots and exchanging ANYTHING in cigar boxes through car windows - OK, that's a drug addict. Issues of personal responsibility is where I often walked with Rush, and this is a classic. A true test of the man. If he comes out of rehab and says, 'I was wrong about our approach to drugs,' he could single handedly change the way America looks at this problem. If he admits that what separates him and Noelle Bush from crackheads is nothing. Nothing except money, race and lawyers. OK, well that is actually quite a lot. But nothing in the way that makes one of them a stronger or better human being. And that's what Rush has to say:
"I am no better or stronger than a crackhead. I lived for the drug, just like he did; obsessed about getting it all the time, like he did; corrputed and lied about everything else in my life - career, health (the hearing problem is related to this, no doubt - check the amount he was taking daily - Elvis is going "whoa, dude, slow down with that s**t"), relationships, like he did. And we both deserve the same treatment: compassion!"
Because Rush wants, and is already getting, a lot of compassion for this. Let me add my full hearted endorsement of that, and hope for a successful rehab, and a happy life for him whatever he wants to do thereafter. Rush Limbaugh was the first one to say "Bill Maher was right" when I was in the hot seat after 911, and I will always appreciate and remember that. He also has a good sense of humor, and enjoys jokes I've done about him. I want to be able to back him.
But he's gotta keep it real when he gets out. If he starts living the morally indefensible double standard he has been defending his whole career, game over. He learned nothing, or is too weak to admit it. That would be a shame, because I think he has it in him to do this, and the power and accomplishment from turning this battleship around would be, well - a rush.
Posted by safesearching at October 13, 2003 01:14 PM
1000% wrong.
There are wide variations from person to person in the effects of a given drug on someone.
The more prone to addiction someone is genetically, the greater the "high" they'll get from the early use of a given drug.
You do not choose to become addicted to Oxy-Codone pain drugs.
The addiction comes from using the product and is directly related to dose and how long you use it.
Rush was being treated for pain as a result of a back condition. With the time and dose involved with that, the addiction was as sure as the sun comes up in the morning.
It is a side effect of the drug and nothing more than that.
The real question is how one manages the addiction while using the drug?
This is what the Dr. helps you do. This is what Rush bypasssed and this was his error.
He self medicated and got himself in trouble. It happens all the time and he fessed up to that. Why he self medicated and how it was that his Dr. did not treat his pain to Rush's satisfation are questions that I hope he will answer when he returns.
Why he decided to detox and get off the meds entirely is beyond me. He should have just gradually cut back on the amount with the help of a Dr.
Now he will have to deal with the pain. I do not understand this.
A better high could be obtained from a bottle of Thunderbird.
For an addict to these sorts of painkillers, the addiction to painkillers in large part CAUSES THE PAIN.
Dr. Drew Pinsky, who is a specialist in this area (was an excellent article on Rush and this addiction a few days ago by him posted here) has mentioned that once one is addicted to painkillers, the brain will actually keep producing the pain that the painkillers were prescribed for in order to cause the person to keep taking the drug.....the pain actually ends up lasting longer than it would have if no opiate painkillers were given in the first place.
When he's treated painkiller addicts and got them both detoxed and into long-term rehab he's had patients have their "severe back pain" mysteriously disappear over and over again.
Another thing he's noted is that for whatever reason a lot of "chronic back pain" patients have underlying psychological problems. This isn't saying that EVERYONE with back pain is a mental patient and the pain isn't real, it's just there's an interesting correlation.
But the mind is an incredibly powerful thing. Opiates are SO addicting that the mind will actually create pain to insure that the supply of opiates will continue into the body.
I never agree with him, but this comment describes what Rush did to himself.
Maybe it doesn't give YOU a high.(I've never taken an opiate painkiller, myself).
I've heard Ben Stein (who had a long-term addiction problem of his own which he beat) say that they make you feel "wonderful."
The point is people are different. I don't get drunk and really don't drink much because the few times I did I felt depressed and withdrawn and lost no inhibitions. Other people become the life of the party and lose their inhibitions when they drink.
Do I sit here stupidly extrapolating my singular experiences with alcohol to the other 5 billion members of the human race?
Dr. Pinsky also said that when an addicted person goes off these drugs, it can cause that person feel extremely sad, even grief-stricken for a year.
It's pretty clear he went in for a secret detox a couple of times but never rehabbed. (The two are completely different; without rehab, detox is meaningless, as you're 100% guaranteed to start using the drug again.
Only missing a month of the show seems like an absurdly short period of time, so it seems he's now going to detox and attempt a "quicky" rehab, which doesn't seem like such a great idea.
Rush wouldn't be in rehab were it not for our "approach to drugs".
You're probably right about this but it reminds me of the distinction made between a murder committed during a burglary and a murder commited because of racism (i.e., a "hate" crime). Either way, the victim is just as dead.
Furthermore, Rush's doctor probably stopped prescribing oxycontin to keep him from getting dependant. If he still had pain issues, he really should have consulted his physician, not his housekeeper.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.