I'm not anti-first amendment.
I do think that anyone who writes for public consumption should have to demonstrate that there is a need for their writing, that they are trained in the art of communication and have only lawful intentions.
They should be required to demonstrate their abilities and qualifications to the federal government, state government and any other municipal authority which wants to become involved.
The license to write should only be issued to those free of any criminal convictions, charges or suspicions.
Any writing materials should be available only to holders of a federal writers license.
In order to transmit any written material the writer must have a concealed carry license from local authorities if so required.
These would not infringe upon the rights guaranteed by the first amendment but would act to protect the citizens, especially the children, from injury caused by exposure to dangerous writing.
Absolutely! I'm not for taking the right to vote away from women either.
I do think that anyone who wears a bra and panties should be able to name our 3 branches of federal government, the Speaker of the House and the President of the Senate before entering the voting booth.
YAAG. I fear that your satire will go unheeded by the author however. Buying into the agenda purchases him exemption as one of the elite doesn't it? After all I'm sure he would be right in line to become a Government registered writer, therefore an integral part of any good dictatorial
certain other law enforcement officials. Very important that he make that distinction between the police and certain other law enforcement officials
BTW love your 'spotlight'. KUTGW.