Let’s just be blunt about it. You obviously want to be able to screw children as young as thirteen years old. Any justification you try to come up with will ring hollow in the face of that putrid truth.
That's like saying if you oppose prosecuting homosexuals for sodomy, you must be a homosexual. Or if you favor equal rights for blacks, you must be black yourself.
The age of consent has been puberty since biblical times. Bar and bat mitzvahs are testament to this reality. You don't like this? Take it up with God. Heck, take it up with history. If you're OK with calling our ancestors perverted creeps, that's certainly your prerogative.
The difference between me and you is I don't let anybody tell me what to think. My sweet spot has always been mid-20's* to mid-30's. Even in my teens, I was never attracted to teens, and I certainly am not attracted to them now. Not because I think it's some kind of perversion, but because I don't find them attractive. They're like green mangoes - not quite ready. But that's my personal taste.
It's not medieval that teachers are being prosecuted for messing around with post-puberty students - it's simply stupid, just like alcohol prohibition. If the Israelites, who were so religious that they killed idolaters, had no issues with the age of consent being set at puberty, and nobody up till the late 19th century had this issue, which coincided with them also banning alcohol, it's time to let the nuttiness go.
* Where were these horny teachers when I was a teen?