O.K.
You can start with these:
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2012/mar/25/daniel-everett-human-language-piraha
https://aeon.co/essays/the-evidence-is-in-there-is-no-language-instinct
http://thelousylinguist.blogspot.com/2010/09/debunking-chomskys-poverty-of-stimulus.html
http://childsplay.scientopia.org/2010/09/02/754-revision/
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/evidence-rebuts-chomsky-s-theory-of-language-learning/
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/865339/posts
But next time, do your own research instead of merely excepting someone as “expert” because that claim has been offered so frequently in the primary public media sources. The primary public media sources are not an educated persons best friend. Their venues ARE agendas.
Dude, I’m to my ass in alligayors right now.I had hoped you might just give me a brief overview in a few words but I guess that was too much to ask. Quite frankly Chomsky is not worth my time to chase him around the internet. Thanks for the advice, I’ll look at it as being worth exactly what I paid for it.