To: 2ndDivisionVet
The main point from
The House Intelligence chief just tossed a huge wrench into Trump-related investigations, Business Insider, Mar 22 2017 :
"... The California Republican went on to say the collection occurred on "numerous occasions" and was not related to the FBI's investigation into Russian meddling in last year's presidential election.
"Details about US persons associated with the incoming administration, details with little or no apparent foreign intelligence value, were widely disseminated in intelligence community reporting," Nunes said.
The information he spoke of was collected legally, in his view, under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, and he did not know if the surveillance consisted of phone calls, but that the intelligence reports he had seen "clearly show" Trump and his team WERE "monitored." ..."
3 posted on
03/22/2017 11:30:17 PM PDT by
Yosemitest
(It's SIMPLE ! ... Fight, ... or Die !)
To: Yosemitest
So, either he is lying or the other jackasses on the committee are are.
7 posted on
03/22/2017 11:42:52 PM PDT by
Vendome
(I've Gotta Be Me - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wH-pk2vZG2M)
To: Yosemitest
Who unmasked the names? Who leaked the info?
10 posted on
03/22/2017 11:58:38 PM PDT by
Ray76
(DRAIN THE SWAMP)
To: Yosemitest
Spy v Spy played with leaks of partial raw intel into the public space. Are 17 IC spook orgs too many or not enough?
11 posted on
03/23/2017 12:01:03 AM PDT by
Paladin2
(No spellcheck. It's too much work to undo the auto wrong word substitution on mobile devices.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson