Because I went on Twitter and read it, and it was like my birthday x1000. I was reading from (allegedly) a real mainstream media source paragraphs like the following:
While there is an excellent cast to be made the Hillary committed treasonous actions, the strongest case the FBI has is charging both Bill and Hillary Clinton as well as the Clinton Foundation of Racketeering. There’s no wonder why it’s taken this long for the FBI to bring forward a recommendation. The rabbit hole is so deep on this one that it has taking dozens of investigators to determine the full extent of the crimes that have been committed. Perhaps the most interesting question here is whether or not the FBI’s investigation will be able to directly link The Clinton Foundation with The Hillary Victory Fund. If this happens, the DNC itself may be in jeopardy of accusations of either being an accomplice or of being complicit in racketeering.
Everyone on Twitter is going with this. Was it real, did the Huffpo write it? Admittedly, it seems to have been published without benefit of proofreader. If it's fake maybe just the scent of it will catch on, because it's one of the most truthful articles ever written about this criminal witch.
As far as I can tell from Google, the article that HuffPo pulled, “Hillary Clinton to be Indicted on Federal Racketeering Charges” is a blog article. While it would be fantastic if true, I want to see it confirmed through a reliable source before celebrating.
So, would Trump do better or worse against the Bern than he would against crooked Hillary?
I’m thinking that the Dems could put up anyone and have a tough go at it—Donald does not pull punches like the typical Republican.